Even factoring in overclocking, the R9 390 … But unfortunately for the AMD cards, the cheaper Palit GeForce GTX 970 JetStream (S$479) edged ahead in all our tests but one. By subscribing, you indicate that you have read & understood the SPH's, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 review: Say hello to 4K ray traced gaming, Epic Games is celebrating the holidays with 15 free titles starting from Dec 17, The ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 (GX550) is an eye-popping beast in every sense, Website/App of the Year for Consumer Tech Enthusiasts, Best Engagement Strategy by a Media Owner: Loyalty & Engagement Awards 2018. The authoritative voice on technology trends, gadget shootouts, and geeky life hacks you never knew you could live without. Make a wish and stand to win prizes, 4 ASUS notebooks that will meet the demands of any ultraportable buyer. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 … In Crysis 3, things return to what we observed in 3DMark 2013. Have feedback on the article for the editorial team? This ultimately isn’t a very impressive overclock, and it translated into an approximately 4% increase in all three 3DMark tests. At least in Shadow of Mordor, AMD’s strategy to boost high-resolution gaming performance by increasing memory bandwidth appears to have paid off. 64.6 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s AMD Radeon R9 390X. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. It should be based on the the old Pitcairn chip (e.g. To help quantify things, the R9 390X was almost 11% faster than the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming at a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. Device: 1002 67B0 Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390X, ASUS R9 390X, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 300 The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. Radeon R9 390 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1440. Second-generation Maxwell also continues to shine in to power consumption department, and both NVIDIA cards rounded up the bottom of the charts in our power consumption test. At the most demanding resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels and Very High settings, the Radeon R9 390 series cards look like they finally managed to get ahead of the Palit GeForce GTX 970 thanks to their excess memory bandwidth. The same story repeats itself in Tomb Raider, but with one key difference – the R9 390X actually loses out to the GeForce GTX 970 at both tested resolutions. We managed to overclock the Radeon R9 390X to a core clock of 1130MHz and an effective memory clock of 6480MHz, representing just a 5% and 8% increase over stock speeds respectively. AMD Radeon R9 390 Catalyst 15.7 also reportedly offers performance improvements in Tomb Raider, so these results should show the latest performance figures at the time of writing. Find out how your PC compares with the Radeon Software Installer 4: New user interface and intuitive Radeon Software Installer that includes options for express install, custom install and clean uninstall. The number of stream processors also remains unchanged from the 290 series, with the R9 390X featuring 2816 stream processors and the R9 390 a more modest 2560. Mining benchmark & gpu compare for , beamhashII, bitcore, cnr, cuckaroo_swap, cuckatoo31, ethash, kawpow, mtp, x16r, x16rv2, x21s crypto algos | AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 | Sort: -power MinerMonitoring complete Windows/Linux mining monitoring and controlling software with iOS/Android applications To enjoy benefits of Warranty, Rescue, Promotion and Support. The gap does close a fair bit at higher resolutions and with 8x MSAA turned on, likely owing to the generous amount of memory bandwidth available to the 390 series cards. The difference was most pronounced at a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels with anti-aliasing turned off, where the NVIDIA card was just under 14% faster than the R9 390X. |. Added support for AMD Radeon R9 Fury series, R9 390 series, R9 380 series, R9 290 series, R9 285, R9 260 series, R7 360, and R7 260 desktop graphics products. It was also here that the R9 390X came within a few frames of the GeForce GTX 980’s performance. 06-30-2015, 05:58 PM. This resulted in just under a 6% gain in 3DMark 2013. What is the difference between Nvidia Titan X and AMD Radeon R9 390? As per our practice when doing initial reviews of new cards, we’ll be putting both cards through our full suite of synthetic and real-world gaming benchmarks: For our temperature and power consumption tests, we used the Fire Strike Extreme benchmark in 3DMark 2013. MSI Radeon R9 390 DirectX 12 R9 390 GAMING 8G 8GB 512-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card. AMD Radeon R9 390 Vendor Micro-Star International Co ., Ltd. # of cards 1 SLI / CrossFire Off Memory 8,192 MB Clock frequency 1,040 MHz (0 MHz) Average clock frequency N/A Memory clock frequency 1,500 MHz (0 MHz) Average memory clock frequency N/A Average temperature N/A Driver version 15.150.1004.0 Driver status Not Approved AMD’s overclocking performance was actually more or less on par with the GeForce GTX 970, which posted around a 6% gain when overclocked. AMD R9 390 & 390x benchmarks? There were just a few frames of difference across all the cards at all our tested settings, a relatively minuscule difference that gamers would be hard-pressed to notice in-game. Nevertheless, these are just synthetic benchmarks, and we’ll refrain from jumping to any hasty conclusions that AMD is failing to live up to its claims of performance at high resolutions. The R9 390X posted the highest peak power consumption – 417 watts – in 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme. We ran the game on Ultra settings (the highest available) with HD Textures enabled, setting it up to devour quite a bit of video memory. No 198402868E. Christmas shopping up to 80% off. If you need options for console gaming, BenQ’s got them in spades! The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. It’s really testament to the strength of NVIDIA’s second-generation Maxwell cards that the GeForce GTX 970 can continue to remain competitive against AMD’s latest gambit. Core Clock: 1060 MHz (OC Mode) 1040 MHz (Gaming Mode) 1000 MHz (Silent Mode) Max Resolution: 4096 x 2160 DisplayPort: 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 DVI: 2 x DL-DVI-D Model #: R9 390 GAMING 8G Return Policy: View Return Policy The Radeon R9 390 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R9 380. Happily enough for AMD, there is a positive turnaround in Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor. On the other hand, the PowerColor PCS+ Radeon R9 390 just managed to edge out its direct competitor, the GeForce GTX 970, by less than 1%. The Radeon R9 390 is a performance-segment graphics card by AMD, launched in June 2015. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). At a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels and above or with 8x AA enabled, the 390 series cards inched their way to near the top of the benchmarks, trailing only the more expensive GeForce GTX 980 by a small margin. The AMD Radeon R9 M390 is a mobile graphics card from 2015 and positioned as a fast mid-range GPU. The GPU is still built on the same 28 nm process that you’d have found in the previous generation. In turn, the Radeon R9 390X was on average around 8% faster than the R9 290X, a modest gain that’s to be expected given that there have been no fundamental changes save for a few tweaks and speed boosts here and there. The R9 390X, on the other hand, is starts at US $429, and offers performance … with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark. You can reach out to them here. The smaller the overlap between the … The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. All R9 390xs will have 8gb memory, as will the R9 390s. ... you shouldn't have THAT much difficulty differentiating between the new Radeon cards. All Rights Reserved. The GeForce GTX 980 raced ahead at the resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels with anti-aliasing turned off. The less powerful PowerColor PCS+ Radeon R9 390 ran cooler at 65℃, probably owing to its lower clock speeds and pared-down Hawaii core. Our temperature tests are conducted by looping 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme for 15 minutes and then checking the highest recorded temperature. This review will be focused on the R9 390 8GB, which AMD are targeting to the 1440P crowd. Moving on to more demanding resolutions and settings, we’re really seeing a repeat of what we saw with the Fury X. AMD’s 390 series of cards also need memory-hungry applications to do well, and the company is probably right in framing high-resolution gaming performance as one of the card’s advantages. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Grenada graphics processor, in its Grenada PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12. All three AMD cards were relatively closely matched in Thief. We thank all our supporters who have helped us garner these prestigious media awards in the industry! Hardwarezone.com.sg is part of the SPH Magazines Men's Network, Page 1 of 4 - Introduction: A Familiar Architecture, Page 2 of 4 - A Closer Look: MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G and PowerColor PCS+ R9 390, ASUS X99-Deluxe (Intel X99 chipset) motherboard, 4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDRR-2133 (Auto timings: CAS 15-15-15-36), Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB (Benchmarks + Games), MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G (AMD Catalyst 15.7), PowerColor PCS+ R9 390 (AMD Catalyst 15.7), ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II (AMD Catalyst 15.7), Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming (ForceWare 353.30), Palit GeForce GTX 970 JetStream (ForceWare 353.30). The Radeon R9 390 is priced at US $329, and offers performance competitive to the GeForce GTX 970. This results in the Radeon R9 390 providing 51.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. Nevertheless, the increase is to be expected given the increase in core and memory clocks, and we’d be surprised if AMD actually managed to bring the overall figure down. Buy one now: http://amzn.to/1Tgj7Un Support us by becoming a Patron! When it came to power consumption, the AMD cards showed why the Radeon R9 290 series cards have received so much criticism for their power management and efficiency. Unfortunately, we don’t have an R9 290 card with us at this time, so we’re unable to add it to our comparisons. AMD Radeon R9 390 Both the R9 390X and R9 390 perform well here, with the 390X beating all the other cards at all our tested resolutions. Unified cross-platform 3D graphics benchmark database AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series performance in GFXBench - unified graphics benchmark based on DXBenchmark (DirectX) and …

Traumdeutung Mann Mit Anderer Frau, Vogel Quietscht Wie Schaukel, Zähne Selber Feilen, Abschlussprüfung Kauffrau Im Gesundheitswesen 2019, Abitur In österreich Als Deutscher, 100 Liter Aquarium Set, Itheorie Auto Theorie Schweiz, Serie C Girone C Tabelle, Allgemeine Hochschulreife Durch Bachelor Bayern, Bilder Blumenstrauß Frühlingsblumen, Simple Past Of To Know, Kleines Nordseeküstenschiff Kreuzworträtsel, Werkstudent Hannover Informatik, Katie Fforde: Glücksboten,